In order to safely and accurately recover a rocket from outer space, I developed a thorough MATLAB Simulink Model to analyze the descent of the PRL Phantom 1.0 rocket under a parachute. I implemented wind models, flight parameter deviations, and Monte Carlo Analysis to determine an approximate landing area.
I learned how to use Simulink with basic projects (not shown) and progressively built a comprehensive model for a rocket descending under a parachute from space (partially shown above). The model is mostly parameterized as a way to future-proof the simulations. It includes wind disturbance, wind gusts, and aerodynamic calculations. It uses ode45 to solve the body position and velocity over time.
After refining simulations to perform as expected, I designed a Monte Carlo Analysis to observe various flight trajectories. Different paths were simulated with deviations in apogee, wind disturbance, wind gusts, and initial airspeed. These were then geographically plotted to see where the rocket could land. Overall, there are 6 variables that are pseudorandomly generated to produce various flight paths. Parallel simulations were used to improve solving time.
Finally, I created a statistical analysis to show where the rocket could land based on a sample of 100 simulations. Using their respective flight paths, I created a conical tube to contain approximately 1 and 2 standard deviations of path and landing areas. When recovering a rocket, in the case of an avionics failure, this greatly improves efficiency and the odds of recovering the vehicle. It also drastically affects safety measures, ensuring the well-being of anyone/anything in the projected landing area.
The Panther Rocket Lab Phantom 1.0 rocket aims to pass the Karman Line with onboard avionics, payload, and recovery. To safely recover the rocket from space, a parachute is deployed at apogee using various recovery components. As the Recovery Subsystem Lead, I am in charge of making sure this happens through various testing, procedures, and documentation.
Plastic screws were initially selected based on approximate calculations for shear strength. Then, a testing rig was designed with CAD and manufactured with a water jet and various shop tools.
The testing rig and shear pins were further tested for shear stress using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) on Autodesk Fusion. This was done for various sizes of screws to analyze the breaking mechanism and potential flaws.
Then, multiple tests were conducted using a Universal Testing Machine with wedge grip clamps. The results were very similar to the FEA predictions. They broke in a consistent and calculable manner.
Finally, a shear pin size was selected for the rocket and integrated into the overall CAD assembly to support further simulations.
In order to reliably eject a parachute in space, the nose cone must be pressurized with CO2. I entirely recreated an OTS component that allows for CO2 ejection on Autodesk Inventor CAD.
My team and I conducted ejection tests using the CO2 pressurization and also launched a test rocket using this equipment. These tests were done to ensure ejection on larger rockets.
After verifying the eligibility of the component, I integrated it into the PHANTOM rocket CAD assembly for further design and analysis.
In the future, I plan to analyze the dynamics of parachute deployment in microgravity. The lack of air could cause entanglement, folds, and failure to inflate.
Image Credit: NASA
During my fellowship at MercK, I directly worked with employees in various departments to engineer solutions to simplify and enhance their scientific processes. These projects ranged from creating ergonomic grips to designing and simulating layouts for a chemical treatment test.
At Merck, I created many different prototypes of projects before settling on a final design. With 3D printing and CAD, I was able to refine the projects exactly to the employees' liking. This project created a safer and more efficient way for chemists to transport vials of various sizes.
The finished product exceeded expectations and created a safer, more efficient, and more creative workplace environment. Employees often returned to have more products created or simulated.
I created innovative parts such as a female-female SVL Cap to make chemical sample creations easier.
I also created parts oriented around ergonomics and user comfort.
I recreated an inertion funnel patented by my supervisors. The recreation showed material savings and printing with minimal supports.
I recreated a Microtissue Mold to support cell culture experiments.
Using my engineering skills, I saw a problem with my rocket and aimed to engineer my way out of it. I created a unique avionics bay that also served as a coupler, transition, and parachute anchor.
Once the part was printed and assembled, I integrated it into my team's rocket and began flying it. This proved to be very useful and I was able to optimize it even further after learning its weakness through testing.
Finally, after months of planning, designing, building, and testing, our rockets were completed and their performance led us to the top 50 teams in the national competition out of 750. Over three years, I conducted over 40 test flights.
As a result of our team's hard work and my innovations, our team won the National Best Rocket Craftsmanship Award. Furthermore, I initiated a club in my high school with over 40 participants. The club still three years later.
In my Statics course, my group was assigned with designing and manufacturing a truss given certain dimensional constraints. I took up the CAD aspect of the project to create a a strong truss using my engineering knowledge.
I wanted our group to excel at the real test so I conducted Finite Element Analysis (FEA) with loading similar to the test. I then tailored the design to improving on the truss's weaknesses.
Finally, after designing, testing, and improving, I 3D-printed the final version of the truss. The truss passed the 500N load test with minimal deflection, and withstood over 200 pounds of force before failure (we jumped on it).